Bookhype.com: It’s no BookLikes, but it’s better than GoodReads even in beta.

UPDATE: The developer has just added a search function for your personal library!  Yay!

While stalking the developer of my WP plug-ins, I discovered she was getting ready to launch a new book tracking website.  So by sheer luck I was one of the first people to join Bookhype.com.  It was basic, but it had potential right out of the gate for some interesting features, so I uploaded my data and started playing.

That was back in the beginning of September, and the site’s feature set has grown enough that it seemed now was as good a time as any to update friends who have not yet joined, about the site’s progress.

The most important thing to remember is that the site is still in beta.  So while a lot of features are missing, I don’t know if they’re missing because they haven’t been added yet, or because they’re never going to be added.  If I do know, I’ll mention that below.

What the site has that’s working for me:

A pretty easy to use interface; the UI is easy on the eyes and for the most part extremely easy to use.  You can log multiple reads and multiple editions (including purchasing information), but your shelves only display one edition, which can get confusing until you get the hang of it.

Some pretty good reading stats – with charts! – that include things like genres and page counts, as well as books acquired over time.

Series tracking:  It’s pretty slick.  You can follow series, and if you opt in, new titles added to those series will be automatically added to your shelves, and also as an opt in, you can get an email notification.  The back end of the site has some nice logic built in, so series that have changed names mid-way through can alias the old/new name, and the librarian functions allow merging/deleting series, avoiding potential bloating.  What could be better:  it would be nice to be able to nominate how new titles are added to your shelves.

Librarian functions:  One of the first “big” features that were added after launch, and of course, I applied.  Because I guess I need more databases in my life.  The features are pretty well thought out and robust, though I’d still love to see the ability to bulk combine titles and bulk merge authors, something I hate to admit GoodReads got right.  What could be better:  while the site handles pseudonyms pretty well, there’s no cross-referencing of pseudonyms on the author pages themselves.  Also, there seems to be no plans for handling multiple covers other than adding more additions.  This is going to cause wicked edition bloat, and at the moment, there seems to be no way to merge duplicate listings, though that may change.

What I think really needs addressing:

Personal library:  this is the part where I’m most critical.  At the moment there’s only one way to view it and that’s cover mode.  Which looks nice, but doesn’t make my heart sing because I want to see the data, preferably in list view with the ability to sort by ALL the columns.  At this time you also can’t search your books, which is HUGELY problematic. (Update:  now you can search!)  You can filter by Read, Reviewed, Currently Reading, Wishlist but you can’t just search out a specific title, and you can’t see all the books on your shelves by author.  I’ve emailed the developer about this and I know she’s thinking about it, but I don’t know what her plans are, if any, for improving the ability to manipulate your own shelves.  I’ve also asked about creating personal shelves, which she’s nixed, as she’s going the tag route.  When I mentioned they weren’t that easy to use, she immediately went about making them MUCH easier.  Now I’m hoping she’ll move their location on the page to make them easier to access on the fly.

Social aspects – there aren’t any.  You can follow people, but the lack of notification when someone likes or comments makes the following a moot point.  I’m guessing this is still something that’s in development and as such I’m REALLY hoping she’ll make the activity page one that’s interactive, with the ability to comment on posts, and respond to other comments, directly from the activity page.

Generally the site has a lot of potential and seems to have a very dedicated developer intent on creating a book site that is completely independent of Amazon.  It’s got a lot of nice touches, and with a few more could be a much better alternative to GoodReads.  Fingers crossed.

8 thoughts on “Bookhype.com: It’s no BookLikes, but it’s better than GoodReads even in beta.”

  1. I don‘t know whether you saw this: There‘s been a discussion about Bookhype in the Outpost group (in the “new website“ thread IIRC), where Christine (MR) shared an email exchange she had with the owner, whom she knows from working together on another blog a few years ago. Christine flat-out asked whether there were any plans to make Bookhype into a sort of new BL, or otherwise put more of a focus on the social aspect … and there are not. The owner said this was way beyond what she could handle — book / library tracking is all she has in mind.

    1. Yes, I did see that, and it didn’t surprise me. She’s not wrong about what’s involved in building it from the ground up. But the hard truth is I don’t think we’ll ever see another bookikes, which is why I’m loathe to give it up. Getting in at the beta level for BookHype, maybe I can help shape it a tiny bit so that if BL disappears, at least there’ll be someplace to track books and have a tiny bit of social.

  2. And there’s the post. That was quick!

    I’ve been trying Bookhype and maybe if I was big into getting into series or keeping track of series (like FictFact used to do), it would be great. But without the social aspect, it is never going to work for me. I’ll be stopping at New Years.

    I don’t see how it’s any better than Librarything to be honest. Easier to use, yes, but not something I want to spend my time on. I’ve even stopped posting my reviews there, just rating books.

    The charts are fantastic, as long as you don’t want to copy them or actually DO anything with them besides look at them. I wondered about screen shotting them, but then realized you have to hover/select each piece in the pie/graph to get the numbers and I don’t want to screen shot that many pix.

    And with Themis’s comment, it is definitely gone from my list of tools at new years.

    1. I think the developer is planning on adding social aspects – it makes no sense for her not to if she’s built in likes and comments. And I know from the post Themis alluded to above that Ashley (the developer) is very interested in knowing what made BL so wonderful for us, in terms of groups, lists, etc. So my guess is that she’s plotting it out and trying to figure out the architecture of it all, though I haven’t asked her directly.

      1. You’re right, it doesn’t make sense. But that isn’t enough of a reason for me, as I’ve seen some completely “stooopid” on the internet before, sigh.

        If I haven’t seen any signs of social by years end, I’ll be gone. I am struggling to keep up just tracking on wp, blogger, lt, devilsreads and bookhype. Years end is going to see some changes from me in terms of just what I am doing online.

        Sounds like you’ll be doing the same, even if not at the same time 🙂

    1. If you’re looking for a BL replacement, you’ll be disappointed, but as a GR replacement it has serious potential.

      1. Yea, more for GR while I like GR on some things, I don’t care for it when it comes to social interactions for sure. which was my favorite part about BL, the people and community.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.